Your data. Your choice.

If you select «Essential cookies only», we’ll use cookies and similar technologies to collect information about your device and how you use our website. We need this information to allow you to log in securely and use basic functions such as the shopping cart.

By accepting all cookies, you’re allowing us to use this data to show you personalised offers, improve our website, and display targeted adverts on our website and on other websites or apps. Some data may also be shared with third parties and advertising partners as part of this process.

Product test

ARM Windows: Microsoft Surface Pro X tested

Martin Jud
16.12.2019
Translation: machine translated

Microsoft has done a lot of things right with the Surface Pro X. Not only is the almost borderless display appealing, but the new inductively charging slim pen and the "pen garage" are also impressive. The downside is the ARM processor, which severely limits functionality.

The technical data of the test device:

Genius design

The Surface Pro X looks to me like the perfection of the [Surface Pro 7]/en/page/microsoft-surface-pro-7-tested-final-usb-c-and-ice-lake-u-processors-14440). This gives you a display that is 0.7 inches larger despite having roughly the same surface area of 287 x 208 mm and has been pulled a lot closer to the edge of the tablet. It is also 1.2 mm thinner with a thickness of 7.3 mm. The Pro X weighs 774 g without the keyboard.

Under the stand, the Pro X lacks the microSD slot familiar from the Pro 7. Instead, you have the option of inserting a nano SIM card under the stand or replacing the SSD yourself. There are also two USB 3.1 Type-C ports and the volume rocker on the left-hand side of the device. The power button and Surface Connect port are located on the right-hand side. A classic 3.5 mm jack connection is unfortunately missing.

Sharp, bright display

The 13-inch high-gloss display with IPS panel has a resolution of 2880 x 1920 pixels and comes in the typical Microsoft 3:2 format. Thanks to the high resolution, employees can have a lot of fun with the pen - even if you get your head close to it, you won't be able to see any pixels.

To find out how well the display is illuminated, I measure it with the x-rite i1Display Pro:

Officially, the display is supposed to have a brightness of 450 cd/m². I measured an average of 490.66 cd/m², which is a very good value for a tablet or notebook. It is also evenly lit, and the 25 cd/m² difference between the brightest and darkest areas is not visible to the naked eye.

In terms of colour space coverage, the display manages to display a spectrum of 94 per cent in sRGB. For Adobe RGB it is 64.8 per cent and for DCI P3 66.7 per cent. When I measure the black and white values, I calculate a crisp, static contrast of 1348:1. The dynamic contrast is 5841:1.

Accessories: keyboard, pen garage and new Surface Slim Pen

When you buy the Surface Pro X, the keyboard and pen are unfortunately not included. The Alcantara-covered keyboard, which turns the device into a notebook, is available in two versions. One with a pen and one without. If you order the version with a pen, you also get an integrated "pen garage". The pen is not only neatly stored inside - it also charges itself thanks to induction.

Unfortunately, Microsoft only sells the keyboard with pen garage including the pen. If you choose a keyboard without a pen, there is no pen garage. If you buy a pen in the future, you will only be able to charge it externally. Incidentally, the pen is no longer round but flat, which is a great adjustment. This makes it even easier to hold. It makes drawing and writing a real pleasure.

The 310 gram keyboard can be used flat or slightly angled. The keys have three-stage illumination. When you type on the 29.5 x 21.7 x 0.5 cm keyboard, the keys bounce comparatively strongly and you feel a clear trigger point. I find typing pleasant and quiet. There is nothing to criticise about the trackpad with multi-finger gesture support.

Speakers

Battery performance

Microsoft gives the Surface Pro X a lithium-ion battery with 38.2 Wh. I eagerly measure how long it lasts on YouTube in a continuous loop, try a stress test and measure the runtime when working in the office.

Youtube continuous streaming

I set the brightness of the display to 150 cd/m² and run music videos on YouTube until the device can take no more. The automatic shutdown comes after 8 hours and 31 minutes. That's a good performance. But I'm surprised that the Pro X doesn't last even longer, because compared to other convertibles with a normal processor, this is no mean feat.

Battery life under maximum performance

In order to push all the hardware to its limits, I usually run the stress test HeavyLoad and FurMark at the same time with the screen set to maximum brightness. But unfortunately both programmes don't want to do what I want.

Well, this device can't be stressed. But it's starting to stress me out, because that's how it works with many programmes on this device. You have to be aware of this before you buy it.

Battery life for office work

If I use the convertible as a mobile office and refrain from running YouTube in the background, I get around twelve hours of battery life, depending on my work. That's a good value for an office device. I can't say whether it's good for an ARM Windows device due to the lack of a basis for comparison.

CPU and graphics processor

The Microsoft SQ1 is an SoC based on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Compute Platform. It is manufactured using the 7 nm process at TSMC and has 8 cores (and 8 threads), half of which are power cores. Four cores are based on the ARM Cortex-A76 and can clock up to 3 GHz, while the power-saving cores are based on the ARM Cortex-A55 and are presumably clocked at up to 1.8 GHz.

The SoC also integrates an X24 LTE modem, navigation systems (GPS, Galileo and others), video decoder and encoder for H.265, Bluetooth 5.0, Wi-Fi 5, a memory controller and a graphics chip. The latter is an Adreno 685, which is presumably also clocked slightly higher than the standard model. Microsoft itself speaks of a theoretical graphics performance of two TeraFLOP.

Performance

To test the performance, I would like to use PCMark 10, Cinebench R20 and Geekbench 5.

Unfortunately, only the CPU benchmark from Geekbench works. With the other two there are again nice error messages.

Geekbench 5 results of the Surface Pro X:

When I search for similar results in the Geekbench browser, this result does indeed correspond to an Intel Core i5, as claimed by Qualcomm. Not one of the eighth generation, however, but rather one of the fourth (Intel Haswell microarchitecture) from 2013.

If you want to see the CPU benchmark result in detail:

Conclusion: A beautiful but expensive office device

The bottom line is that the device scores full marks for looks and workmanship. However, I can't recommend it in terms of software. You'd be better off with a Surface Pro 7, on which the new Slim Pen also works, or another convertible. <p

2 people like this article


User Avatar
User Avatar

I find my muse in everything. When I don’t, I draw inspiration from daydreaming. After all, if you dream, you don’t sleep through life.


Product test

Our experts test products and their applications. Independently and neutrally.

Show all

These articles might also interest you

  • Product test

    Fanless, purple 12-inch Microsoft Surface Pro review: generally good, but…

    by Martin Jud

  • Product test

    Microsoft Surface Pro for Business with the latest Intel chip tested

    by Martin Jud

  • Product test

    Microsoft Surface Pro 7 tested: USB-C and Ice Lake U processors at last

    by Martin Jud