News + Trends
Core Ultra 200S Plus: Two new Arrow Lake CPUs
by Jan Johannsen
Intel Core Ultra 200 Plus review roundup: more performance for less money – with a catch
24.3.2026
Translation: Veronica Bielawski
Intel has refreshed its Arrow Lake line-up with the new Plus models. The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus and the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus offer more performance at the same price – but who do they actually benefit?
While Intel has slapped on «Plus» to the name, the new Core Ultra 200 Plus processors are based on the same Arrow Lake architecture. So what has actually changed? Mainly pricing and positioning. With the 270K Plus, you’re effectively getting Core Ultra 9 285K performance for the price of a Core Ultra 7. And the 250K Plus performs so well that in many scenarios it makes the more expensive model superfluous. Sounds great – but there’s a catch.
Check out my colleague Jan’s article for more info on the processors:
Applications: Intel beats AMD
Both new chips deliver impressive results. Techpowerup notes that in some cases the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus outperforms the Core Ultra 9 285K, which is explained by the higher core count. AMD’s only in the lead with its Ryzen 9 9950X and 9950X3D. This goes in line with a review by Tom’s Hardware, which highlights that the Ryzen 9 9950X costs $515, while the 270K Plus costs $300 – excellent value for money.
The 250K Plus even goes one step further; Techpowerup and Computerbase (in German) both report that the more affordable of the two new chips outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X – its direct competitor – by more than 30 per cent in applications. In fact, it even outperforms the Ryzen 7 9700X and the Ryzen 7 9850X3D. As Computerbase so succinctly puts it, AMD simply has nothing comparable to offer in this price range.
Gaming: solid, but no X3D killer
In gaming, both chips perform well, but not spectacularly so. According to Techpowerup, the 270K Plus outperforms the Core i9-14900K and all previous Intel models. But it falls short against AMD’s X3D processors. According to Techpowerup, the Ryzen 9 9800X3D is ahead by an average of 15 per cent. Tom’s Hardware sees a similar gap and points out that, although the 9800X3D costs 420 dollars, it’s the better choice for gamers.
Techpowerup reports that the 250K Plus’s gaming performance is only 2.7 per cent weaker than that of the 270K Plus – even though it costs 100 dollars less. The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X performs at a similar level, with the 9700X offering only a 1.5 per cent edge. Only the 9800X3D clearly pulls ahead with a 20 per cent lead, but it’s over twice as expensive. Computerbase sums it up perfectly: if gaming’s your main priority and you don’t have the coin for an X3D, the 250K Plus is the perfect choice.
Efficiency: better, but not perfect
Intel has improved significantly on power consumption compared with the 14th generation. Techpowerup measured an average of 140 watts (W) for the 270K Plus during general use and 110 W during gaming. That’s slightly more than AMD’s current processors, but far fewer than the older Intel processors. For the 250K Plus, the figures are even lower at 100 watts in applications and 83 watts in gaming, as reported by Techpowerup.
However, Computerbase points out one weak spot: in gaming, the 270K Plus uses significantly more power than the 250K Plus – without the performance gain to justify it. So if you don’t absolutely need the 270K’s top-end performance, the 250K Plus is the more efficient choice.
Platform and overclocking: stable, but a dead end
When it comes to overclocking, the 250K Plus really stands out. Techpowerup achieved a stable 5.7 gigahertz (GHz) across all cores – well above the 5.3 GHz specified by the manufacturer. The 270K Plus couldn’t be overclocked as much because it already runs close to its limit. The only downside is that with Intel, overclocking is reserved for the expensive Z890 chipset. Both Computerbase and Techpowerup criticise this artificial restriction, which AMD doesn’t impose on its cheaper motherboards.
One key point when it comes to longevity is the socket: LGA 1851 is a dead end. With the Plus models, it has reached the end of the line. AMD’s AM5 platform, by contrast, will be supported at least until the end of next year. So, if you plan to upgrade later, AMD is the safer bet.
Intel Binary Optimization: promising, but still a long way off
With the Plus models, Intel has introduced the Binary Optimization Tool, or IBOT. The concept: software is automatically optimised as it loads, which is supposed to enable performance gains without any work from developers – much like graphics drivers replacing inefficient shader code. It has potential, but at the moment it has very little support.
At present, IBOT supports just 12 games, including the 2018 title Shadow of the Tomb Raider. Activating it requires three manual clicks – which is likely to put most users off. The roadmap promises monthly updates and automatic activation in future.
Price and verdict: the 250K Plus steals the show
Techpowerup, Tom’s Hardware and Computerbase all reach the same conclusion: the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is the real highlight. For 200 dollars, it offers an exceptional mix of application and gaming performance that AMD can’t match in this price range.
The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus especially shines in applications. But the extra 100 dollars over the 250K Plus is hard to justify for just five per cent more gaming performance. Tom’s Hardware puts it bluntly: if gaming is your main focus, the 9800X3D is the better choice. If you value productivity and gaming equally and don’t have the budget for an X3D chip, the 270K Plus is a convincing all-round package.
But one word of caution that applies to both chips: if you’re planning for the long term and want future upgrades, steer clear of them.
Overall, these two new chips are a step in the right direction for Intel, given that in recent years, the former market leader has had to concede defeat to AMD more and more often. This refresh brings Intel back into the running and, above all, intensifies competition, particularly in terms of price.
Header image: Screenshot Youtube / Gear Seekers
Kevin Hofer
Senior Editor
kevin.hofer@digitecgalaxus.chFrom big data to big brother, Cyborgs to Sci-Fi. All aspects of technology and society fascinate me.
Background information
Interesting facts about products, behind-the-scenes looks at manufacturers and deep-dives on interesting people.
Show allThese articles might also interest you
12 comments
later