Yes, it is compatible and also runs stably.

RAM usually does not know that it is only compatible for a certain brand.

Unfortunately, we do not have any exact information on the delivery date at the moment. As soon as this changes, we will update the page.

Yes, it uses another version of Aura that is exactly the same. The name is merely replaced, but the lighting effects are the same.

Hello from my side. Overclocking ram sticks doesn't make much sense unless you want to render things all the time or have a lot to do with data processing. So, overclocking means you increase the clock frequency of the sticks. E.g. from 3600 mhz to 4000 mhz. You do this without increasing the cas latency. The sticks are very good for overclocking, but I would not recommend it. -> bluescreens etc...

I have no problems with this Ram and a Ryzen 3700X, runs basically stable with XMP activated. However, I can't offer you any more information (benchmarks or anything) because I'm still tinkering with the setup (Win10 + Hackintosh). I have only played a "little" Doom 2016 under Win10 so far and had no problems.

Latency has nothing to do with the quality of the memory modules. Speed and latency is the main factor in determining how fast memory modules are. E.g. in this case both memory modules have 3600Mhz. Frequency is expressed in Hertz, which means "cycles per second". In this case 3600 cycles per second. CAS latency is given in cycles. So, a CAS16 RAM will take 16 cycles to respond and the CAS17, 17 cycles. Now, DDR4 3600 CAS16 will take 16/3600 seconds which is equal to 0.004444 seconds to respond while the DDR4 3600 CAS 17 will take 17/3600 which is equal to 0.00472 seconds to respond. Simply put, the memory module 3600MHz CAS 16 will be faster than 3600MHz 17CAS. It always depends on what applications you are using. For gaming, MHz in general (or for the new AMD Ryzen processors) are better, as long as the latency is not too high. For scientific calculations, lower CAS latencies would be more suitable, so that the cycles would be shorter (faster), (also ECC memory) "ECC" (error-correcting code / error detection) would be more suitable. If you need more detailed information see this Wikipedia link https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki... Hope this helped.