Siehe obere Antwort: Hi, there is no specific place for a computer but I just tested this on my 300 with a MacBook 13 and you can put it in the place provided for the source in the back but it is not pleasant and in front it also passes but it will not be protected ... Inside it's not possible ... For the photo mat there is not much space ... On the Lowepro website they said that my d800 and my 70-200 would fit ... Yes but not coupled and the d800 goes by forcing ... Otherwise the bag is great, I use it for cliffs and day hikes ...

I have been using the Peak Design Capture Clip&Plate V3 with the Lowepro Photo Sport BP 300 AW II for a few years now and am very satisfied - fits perfectly. The carrying straps are pretty much 6 cm. The challenge is more where you want to wear the chest strap. I have this at the lowest level and so it fits for me.

I've just tested this on my 300 with a MacBook 13 and I can put it in the place provided for the source in the back but it's not pleasant and in front it goes through too but it won't be protected ... Inside it's not possible ... For the photo mat there is not much space ... On the Lowepro website they said that my d800 and my 70-200 would fit ... Yes but not coupled and the d800 goes by forcing ... Otherwise the bag is great, I use it for cliffs and day hikes ...

I have mounted the part. So it works.

https://www.lowepro.com/de-de/photo-sport-bp-300-aw-ii-schwarz-lp36890-pww/ Größe Kamerafach 21 x 9 x 22.3 cm

the packing volume and thus the size. A professional camera with lens has no place in the 200.

30 litres

The compartment is approx. 39x23cm and has a hole at the bottom right (drain) in case the water bag leaks. My older Camelback 3l measures 44x20cm empty and goes in. However, I have never filled it over 2l and it folds a bit. As a result, the last 1-2dl are sometimes difficult to get out. The 2l from Source and Camelback should fit perfectly. Both systems have advantages and disadvantages: Source: + Closure is not bulky in thickness. Especially important for this backpack. + Valve is hardly ever triggered by mistake + Valve and bag were still tight after 1 year of travel and almost daily use. + Lighter than Camelback - Valve requires greater actuation force. (If you do not drink 5-8l through the valve over several days, this should not be a problem). - Valve consists of several parts. Therefore more difficult to clean +- made of stiffer material. Better inherent stability but also bulkier. Camelback: + Valve easy to operate + Valve easy to clean - Valve easy to operate. Drips with light pressure. - Valve/closure is no longer leak-proof in my case. - heavier than source +- Soft material. More flexible but tends to collapse when it is not hooked into the top of the rucksack.

The description says "Camelbak or Platypus (not included)"

I briefly measured my copy: the fixed frame of the back is 49 cm long. So if the backpack or the lid pocket is not completely full, it should fit.