Your data. Your choice.

If you select «Essential cookies only», we’ll use cookies and similar technologies to collect information about your device and how you use our website. We need this information to allow you to log in securely and use basic functions such as the shopping cart.

By accepting all cookies, you’re allowing us to use this data to show you personalised offers, improve our website, and display targeted adverts on our website and on other websites or apps. Some data may also be shared with third parties and advertising partners as part of this process.

Ubiquiti UF-RJ45-1G: SFP to RJ-45 module
EUR26,34

Ubiquiti UF-RJ45-1G: SFP to RJ-45 module


Questions about Ubiquiti UF-RJ45-1G: SFP to RJ-45 module

What would you like to know?

Avatar

0 questions and answers

avatar
Anonymous

2 months ago

avatar
Anonymous

2 months ago

Helpful answer
I called AVM Fritz! Box directly because of the feedback. You can configure the Fritz!Box 5530 GS Fibre so that it no longer takes the input signal via the glass connection, but via one of the LAN ports. So tiptop. I don't need another module to achieve my goal.
avatar
Eleve-57

3 years ago

avatar
Anonymous

3 years ago • purchased this product

purchased this product
Helpful answer
Branded gear, like HP, Cisco, Juniper usually don't like 3rd party accessories. (a.k.a. lock-in). My Cisco SMB switch does not tolerate this module either.
avatar
Wesiak

4 years ago

avatar
achdt

4 years ago • purchased this product

purchased this product
Helpful answer
In short: most likely yes! It's worth trying. In more detail SFP transceivers generally are quite reasonably defined and abide to sane standards. There are cases where SFP manufacturers went out of their way to implement features of their SFP modules in a fancy pants way expecting special initialization commands in exotic ways which prevents them from working unless specifically recognized and specifically talked to by the device they are being used in. And there are switch or router vendors that went down the full out dick road, maintaining whitelists of specific SFP modules and just plain out disable modules that are not explicitly whitelisted although there is absolutely no sane technical reason for it. Cisco is kind of one of them because they love selling their branded Cisco modules made by the same couple of those major vendors anyone has them manufactured by for 4 times the price. But in general in most cases most combinations should just work fine when using straight dumb optical or Ethernet transceivers. Not with fancy special SFP devices like g.fast modems built in SFP form factor for example though. If you would use a Catalyst Series switch from Cisco you could use "service unsupported-transceiver" that should allow it to work for sure by just disabling Cisco's whitelisting dickery but I suppose there's no such thing on your model.
avatar
Anonymous

4 years ago

avatar
p4trick

4 years ago • purchased this product

purchased this product
Helpful answer
No, that is not possible. You need a G.fast-capable router that can deliver the Internet signal directly to the WAN socket of your own router as a gateway, e.g. Vigor 166 Gen2 or Zyxel XMG3927.
avatar
masta-p

6 years ago

avatar
kuschicom

6 years ago • purchased this product

purchased this product
Helpful answer
Yes, e.g. as uplink ports for cross-building cabling, since fibre optics are potential-free, you don't have to worry about the earth.
avatar
pagano-ag

6 years ago

avatar
Anonymous

6 years ago • purchased this product

purchased this product
Helpful answer
Hello Yes, there are then 10 x RJ45 and also works with conventional RJ45 as a remote station. By the way, you do not have PoE on the ports with the module. It doesn't have to be Ubiquiti SFP, other manufacturers have also been used and according to Ubiquiti forums this has worked.
avatar
JohnnySixArms82

2 years ago

11 of 11 questions

To Top