Hello Simtutz. It is not possible to make a general statement as to whether one of the two is more worthwhile for you, as you do not say what your requirements are. I'll make the assumption that you would like to take photos with both cameras. The main differences between the two devices are as follows. * Sensor resolution - Sony 24Mpx / Lumix 16.10 * Max image size - Sony 6000 x 4000px / Lumix 3840 x 2160px * Sensor size - Sony APS-C / Lumix Micro Four Thirds (The sensor of the Sony is bigger and therefore a bit brighter). * FPS (frames per second) - Sony 11 / Lumix 9 (especially interesting if you want to shoot series, e.g. sports shots). * Lens Mount - Sony e-mount / Lumux Micro Four Thirds From my own experience with the 6300, I know that the Sony has an extremely impressive autofocus. Unfortunately, I don't know whether it is as good with the Lumix. Personally, I own several Sony systems, including the 6300, and am perfectly happy with them for both stills and video. If the resolution of the images doesn't matter to you and you're happy with anything above 1920x1080, I'd recommend the Lumix. You can certainly use the money saved later on for a second lens :) If resolution and/or light intensity (performance in low light) is important to you, I would recommend investing a few francs more.

Yes, hidden behind a flap on the right side of the camera.

Charging is done via a USB cable (micro-USB on camera side), which is included. No special charger is needed.

It is also then in mint condition. The note "Showroom" only shows that the camera would basically be on display for viewing in the branches mentioned below. When you buy it, however, you get a new one.

Of course not, the RX100 V only has a 1" sensor and plays in a different league. The quality of the lenses also plays an important role, whereby the 16-50 already takes really good pictures. The 6300 is a really great camera which I can highly recommend. You can find useful test reports on the Internet.

You probably need to contact the support for this matter. Contact them either via digitec@digitec.ch or 044 575 95 00

Without image stabilisation, shake is only noticeable with zoom lenses with larger zoom ranges. The wider the angle of the lens, the less this is noticeable. With lenses that have image stabilisation, no shaking is noticeable even at larger zoom ranges. Even with many professional cameras, the image stabilisation is only integrated in the lens. The lack of image stabilisation in the camera is therefore only of importance for lenses without image stabilisation and especially for film recordings. These should either be made with the help of a tripod or then only with stabilised lenses. The kit lens is therefore very suitable for filming because it has image stabilisation.

It does not need a positioner. It is charged via USB cable / connector. This cable is included.

The technical difference is that the 6500 has an image stabiliser, the 6300 does not. But whether that is worth twice the price, I doubt. In my opinion, the 6300 is perfectly adequate. You can hold your hand still.

1 battery is included in the delivery.

You can use one of the following two adapters: Sigma MC-11 Adapter Canon EF an Sony E Metabones Adapter Canon EF an Sony E Mount IV

According to Sony, it only comes in small quantities... it's worth pre-ordering.... I'm waiting for mine myself and have been texting Sony ;) I guess next year -.-

As long as they have an E-mount bayonet, they should work.

No, unfortunately the Alpha a6300 does not have a touchscreen.