Samsung C34J791WTR (3440 x 1440 pixels, 34")

Samsung C34J791WTR

3440 x 1440 pixels, 34"


Questions about Samsung C34J791WTR

What would you like to know?

Avatar

0 questions and answers

avatar
tripper84

6 years ago

avatar
Bosko Kovacevic

6 years ago

Helpful answer

I have checked this again individually and it is effectively the case that the model has USB 3.0 ports. The incorrect information on our part has been forwarded for correction, thank you for pointing this out! :)

avatar
elmuedo

4 years ago

avatar
PascalZahner

4 years ago

avatar
>dave

4 years ago

I don't think so... With my monitor, you actually only get the normal stand. With my Samsung monitor you "actually" need a Vesa adapter (100x100). But it works without one. I mounted it on the wall without any adapter. But I can't guarantee that it will work for you. (my monitor: Samsung LU32H850UMUXEN (32", 3840 x 2160 Pixels))

avatar
Anonymous

4 years ago

avatar
hliegmann

4 years ago

Helpful answer

I think it depends more on how the laptop copes with the USB-C than on the monitor. I use the monitor with two laptops on the USB-C: - HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 - Lenovo Thinkpad X1 6th Gen I have the keyboard and headset on the rear USB ports of the monitor. Mouse via Bluetooth directly coupled to each laptop. I never have problems with the HP. On the Lenovo I still have occasional problems; at the beginning I had constant interruptions / reinitialisation of the monitor connection, then I threw down a few tools (Thunderbolt Controller, Powertoys), since then it works (happens maybe 1x/day, when quickly switching full screen vs. window).

avatar
Baby1981

2 years ago

avatar
Baby1981

2 years ago

avatar
Stardustone

2 years ago

Yes, that is possible, the monitors have Thunderbolt 3. But I wouldn't recommend them, the resolution is too low. This Samsung monitor also has Thunderbolt 3, costs much less and has a much higher resolution. You really get something out of it, because 3840x2160 is much more picture for the money, not only in width but also in height. And it's also less wide, which is ergonomically more optimal. Samsung LF32TU870VRXEN (3840 x 2160 Pixels, 32")

avatar
topflash74

2 years ago

I don't know the difference to the other model, you'll have to read up on the spec yourself. But this resolution on a widescreen display is not 4k, I think it's more like 3k. I find the colours very good, but I don't have any specific requirements.

avatar
hischier.michi

2 years ago

avatar
Stardustone

2 years ago

If the screen is not switched off with a button, it should actually be in standby mode and if the PC is switched on, it also receives a signal via HDMI cable to wake up. Does the screen have a setting in the setup menu where you have to set the standby wake-up mode? Something like Auto Source? If the screen is switched off with a button on the front or back of the device, waking up should not be so easy.

avatar
papakostas1t

2 years ago

avatar
msig

2 years ago

Hello, A Vesa 100x100 adapter/wall bracket is supplied (https://images.samsung.com/is/content/samsung/assets/de/display/pdf/Datenblatt_Monitor_LC34J791WTRXZG.pdf). Mfg

avatar
ronald.fuchs

3 years ago

avatar
Zuphil

3 years ago

avatar
Stardustone

3 years ago

The power specifications are often given by the manufacturers in a way that is somewhat difficult to understand. In principle, it depends on the power that a monitor can send to the notebook via Power Delivery via USB-C. It is often difficult to read from the technical data whether it will work without problems with your own notebook. Charging is certainly possible, but whether fast charging is also possible is not always 100% guaranteed. It also depends on the USB-C cable, i.e. it should also deliver the power that comes from the monitor via PD. Dell has a model on offer that would offer a much better resolution, so 90 watts via Power Delivery is definitely better than 65 watts, and the risk of problems with charging is definitely present with only 65 watts via Power Deliery. I would also choose a 3840 x 2160 pixel resolution, because with 3440 x 1440 pixels you have much less screen space. A 32 or 42 inch screen with 3840 x 2160 pixels would definitely be better for a MacBook Pro 2021, because the Macbook panel is also very high resolution. With 3840 x 2160 pixels, you can see as much on the external screen as on the Macbook and the texts are much sharper, even small fonts. This Dell model can deliver 90 watts via USB-C and would certainly be a good choice: Dell UltraSharp U4320Q (42.50 ", 3840 x 2160 Pixels)

30 of 83 questions

To Top