All parents who do this to their children should be punished.

  0

The new normality. 12 months ago, if something like this had been propagandistically promoted for children in the flu season, the KESB would have been called in; today, people act as if the hyperbolic handling of a not overly dangerous disease is perfectly okay.

  0

Last night for the first time I wore a chastity cage, my wife was going out with friends, before she left the house I put it on and handed her the keys

  0

Hello, are there any push-button mobile phones with which you can just make calls and send text messages without radio or internet that still work?

  0

Ladies and Gentlemen, I ordered new AirPods Max from you on 30/07/2025 and received a returned item. I contacted your company in advance by telephone to enquire about the authenticity (sealed) of the goods. The statement confirmed to me over the phone that it was original, VERSIEGELTE NEW GOODS turned out to be false. Incidentally, the conversation was recorded. The AirPods Max you supplied do not correspond to the item description. Contrary to your statement, they are not new goods, but returned goods. These business practices are incomprehensible, especially since returns are offered at a significantly lower price on your website. The AirPods Max were ordered on 30 July and received on 2 August. A check revealed that the product had already been registered with Apple on 22 May 2025. This means that a significant part of the regular Apple warranty (approx. two and a half months) has already expired. In addition, the original packaging was not sealed, as is usual for new Apple products. For these reasons, I am exercising my right to return the AirPods Max. In return, I expect an immediate refund of the payment I have already made. I recommend that all buyers who order Apple products from you make sure that the packaging is still shrink-wrapped. Otherwise, it can be assumed that the item has already been sold and returned several times.

  1

Good evening, I have just received an e-mail from Galaxus telling me that my return has been rejected. Quote: "After careful consideration, we regret to inform you that we have to refuse the return as the serial number of the product does not match the original packaging. You will therefore receive a return. The serial number is an important identification feature that allows us to verify the authenticity and condition of the product. A discrepancy between the serial number on the product and the original packaging casts doubt on the origin and condition of the product." I ordered the item, PC fans of the Corsair brand, exclusively from Galaxus and carefully repackaged and shipped them with DHL. The way I see it, I am now being accused of fraud. Has anyone ever had a similar problem?

  6

Exactly the same product on Apfelkiste for 15.

  0