Good question, I wonder too....
The answer must be there : https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32010R1062&from=EN
with 45W, 40dm2 as monitor (Pbasic=15W) I find EEI Energy Efficiency Index = 0.239 => Class A (almost A+)
maybe I am wrong?
I have the BenQ ScreenBar and it holds quite well on the monitor. You can place the ScreenBar a little to the side of the camera, not perfect but it holds well. To be honest, the camera is too bad for me to use it.
I use the RegionToShare app (https://www.microsoft.com/store/productId/9N4066W2R5Q4?ocid=pdpshare). This allows me to share a region of the screen. I use FancyZones from Microsoft PowerToys to ensure that the windows are always the right size. It works wonderfully, but the CPU performance deteriorates after sharing content for a longer period of time.
My desk is 80cm deep. When I sit at the table normally with the mouse and keyboard, my nose is around 65-70 cm away from the screen. That works for me.
I can see USB-C in the specs and I can confirm the one I bought has it.
You should be able to find pictures of the connections panel by googling it.
In general I recommend this product as long as you don't have to do richly nuanced, pro-level color work.
In a warranty case, the process is under the management of the third party dealer. However, the registration can be carried out with us in the customer account.
you can tell the post office what time you want them to deliver...ex....wants the monitor to be delivered on saturday at 2pm...never had any problems yet
The problem is not the monitor. It's more to do with the way the MacBook recognises the external monitor. I have the same problem with my work laptop and my work monitors. Have you checked the monitor sleep mode? For me, I turn the monitor off and on again and then wake up my laptop and it usually works fine.
Sorry for my poor German
When buying a cable, be careful not to exceed a length of 3m. There is a limit for Power Delivery. The USB-C cable must also be suitable for transmitting 100 watts; cheap cables can cause problems. It must also be capable of at least 5A, which is necessary for 100 watts. Something like this could work, it has 5A but is only 2m.
Delock USB-C - USB-C (2 m)
That's correct. with monitor at its lowest height, there is an approx 5cm gap between the bottom of the monitor and the desk which the stand is on.
That's correct. With monitor at its lowest height, there is an approx 5cm gap between the bottom of the monitor and the desk on which the stand is on.
I have a MacBook Pro with this monitor and keep having problems with the resolution. It's basically due to the faulty macOS Big Sur. However, if you take the USB C cable that comes with the monitor, download the Switch Res X tool and try a bit, the Mac usually accepts the resolution. Sometimes it helps to plug the monitor in and out of the USB C port 4 or 5 times or to change the port.
I read in a test report that he has problems with the KVM switch. "The function of the KVM switch was not always without problems in the test. The keyboard used was sometimes not available after booting to enter the Windows password, but the connected mouse was. The network connected to the monitor was also not always successfully connected. This problem could only be solved by changing the signal source for the KVM switch in the OSD and switching back to the correct USB connection. However, the behaviour was not reproducible in the test and a cause could not be found. Could this be solved by a software update? Does anyone know the problem?
A question that also interests me in view of an upcoming comparable set-up. Because the monitor and the X360 (G4) have not yet arrived, here's a guess: According to the manufacturer, the Intel UHD 620 supports up to 4096x2304 pixels @60Hz on the display port - i.e. around 9.4 million pixels - whereas the 499P9H/00 can "only" display around 7.4 million pixels (5120x1440). So it should at least be possible from the performance of the UHD 620.
In the past, it has helped to install the monitor profile for Windows. This can be found on the Philips support site (here: https://www.philips.ch/c-p/499P9H_00/brilliance-curved-superwide-lcd-display-im-format-329/support) under "Software and drivers" as a "version: 499P9.zip file" from 15 January 2019. To do this, unzip the ZIP file and proceed according to the instructions (find the monitor in the device manager and update the device driver with the downloaded and unzipped driver).
Good luck and (also out of self-interest) thank you for a short feedback...
Hello together
I'm having problems with the monitor with screen sharing. We work with Microsoft Teams and when I share the whole screen, the employees I share with can hardly see it if they are working on a smaller monitor. If I split individual windows and I work in SAP in different transactions in the same mode, the screen no longer updates for the people I am sharing with (the screen freezes). Is there a way to split half of the screen or does anyone else have an idea how I can solve the problem?
Many thanks for your help!
Hello community,
has anyone had experience with this monitor with a Business Dell Latitude 5410 (with Intel UHD 620, i7-10610U)?
How does the monitor behave when connected to such an on-board graphics solution vial USB-C?
According to the Intel website, the following resolutions are supported by this graphics/processor:
4K Support: Yes, at 60Hz
Max Resolution (HDMI): 4096 x 2304@24Hz
Max Resolution (DP): 4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max Resolution (eDP - Integrated Flat Panel): 4096 x 2304@60Hz
So that doesn't necessarily sound like problem-free use of this monitor with 5120x1440 at 60Hz?
Privately, I use a Huawei Matebook Pro X (i7-8550U) with Nvidia GeForce MX150, but I haven't found any information about supported resolutions.
Then another question:
What is the maximum throughput of the network adapter in the monitor? Does it reach 1 Gbit/s? Apparently you first have to activate USB 3 in the monitor to get more than 100 Mbit/s at all. Has anyone ever measured this? Or could someone measure it?
Questions about questions... :-)
Thanks and greetings
Hi,
I use the monitor with a Dell XPS-13 (Intel i7-1065G7 onboard graphics) via USB-C and it works perfectly, both resolution and Ethernet. However, there is a catch with the Gigabit Ethernet: The monitor is delivered in USB 2.0 mode by default - this allows you to achieve the promised 60 Hz at native resolution (70 Hz for me), but Ethernet is limited to ~ 300 Mbps. If you switch to USB 3.0 in the OSD, you can actually achieve 1 Gbps internet speed without any problems - but the refresh rate is limited to an unattractive 30 Hz. This is also stated in the official operating instructions (page 13). That's why I use WiFi again instead of Ethernet, because it gives me ~700 instead of ~300 Mbps in USB 2.0 mode and I don't have to do without 60 Hz. Conclusion: If you want this monitor, a refresh rate of 60 Hz and Gigabit Ethernet, you won't get around a separate USB-C docking station.
What are the requirements to run the 499P9 on the notebook with native resolution of 5120*1440.
I have a new HP 250 G8 notebook with Intel Iris Plus Graphics. There is only 3840*21080 displayed under Win10 despite the monitor driver downloaded from the Phillips website.
However, the HP 250 has no display port but 1 HDMI (as well as 1 USB-C, which, however, does not output any signals at the USB-C port of the monitor; I have not tried USB-C to display port due to lack of cable).
Questions:
- Does the Intel Iris Plus Graphics have limitations here?
- Is the HDMI output not designed for the 5120 resolution?
- Which notebook in the range up to CHF 1,500 is guaranteed to offer the native resolution (for office applications, not for games)?
- Or rather, what graphics/outputs would this notebook have to have?
Best thanks
